Old model
Rented SaaS
- Pay more for every new person
- Tools that don't talk to each other
- Wait and hope for new features
- Stop paying, and it's gone
Shuk Rentals got software built around how its team works.
Shuk Rentals builds property software for a living. For its own pipeline, it wanted a tool that fit the team, not a board the team had to bend around.
1
Tracker built for their workflow
2
Rented tools replaced
~50%
Lower cost
How it was built.
Three steps, shaped around the team from the start.
A call to learn how the team works
Before anything was built, we learned how they ran their pipelineA working demo
The team saw the tracker working before anything was handed overHandover, with their data in it
A hands-on migration moved the old board records across, so the team picked up where it left offThe numbers
Only the features they use. Nothing they don't.
Same workflow, shaped to the team, with nothing they pay for and never use.
Compare
Rented software
Founding.dev · They own it
Built around how the team works
No
✓ Yes
Adding features
Wait and hope they build it
✓ Add it yourself, or we build it
Adding a new person
Costs more every time
✓ Costs nothing extra
Cost each year
Two full subscriptions
✓ About 50% less
Who owns it
The software company
✓ Shuk Rentals
The shift
Renting software vs. owning it.
One keeps costing more every year. The other is built for your business and stays yours.
New model
Founding.dev
- Same price, any team size
- All your tools, easily connected
- Add features when you need them
- Yours to keep, even if you leave
The result
What they built.
One tracker that does the job of both old tools.
01
Replaced Monday.com
A lead board they already know
A tailored board that mirrors the workflow the team was running before.
02
Replaced Trello
Deals and analytics together
Deal, customer, and pipeline tracking moved into the tracker, instead of a separate board.